10 Insane Architectural Crimes You Won’t Believe Nearly Happened

10Demolishing The Whole Of Glasgow


The largest city in Scotland, Glasgow is one of a best places on Earth to knowledge both Victorian pattern and open drunkenness. Had 20th-century formulation officials gotten their way, usually one of those would now be true. In 1945, city officials published a news suggesting they explode a whole of Glasgow.

Had they usually left it during that, a devise competence during slightest have elicited some support from Glasgow’s Edinburgh rivals. But a Bruce Report didn’t wish to get absolved of Glasgow so many as describe it totally unrecognizable. All a aged buildings of a city core would be swept away, along with immeasurable Victorian houses, a handful of slums, and a Glasgow School of Art. In their place would be erected a swath of communist-style petrify blocks circled by an unconstrained motorway. This wasn’t usually a harebrained intrigue that nobody took seriously. In 1947, a devise was given a executive go-ahead.

So how come we’re not now vital in a universe where “Glasgow” is a scapegoat for concrete? For that we can appreciate Adolf Hitler. With Britain definitely pennyless after over half a decade of fighting in World War II, a offer was simply too costly to be feasible. Two years later, a city sensitively ditched a plans, yet not before several aged sections of Glasgow could be broken and transposed with petrify monstrosities.

9Carving Two Highways Through The Heart Of Manhattan


A universe of artist’s lofts and fast gentrification, SoHo in Manhattan is one of New York City’s many eminent districts. The whole area was even announced a stable National Historic Landmark in 1978. Yet it’s usually by a spectacle there was anything left to protect. In a 1950s, New York came tighten to bulldozing a whole district and building dual expressways over it.

Proposed in 1946 and famous as LOMEX, a Lower Manhattan Expressway would have connected a Williamsburg Bridge and Manhattan Bridge over a East River, as good as a Holland Tunnel into New Jersey. This coiling mixed of roads would have bulldozed right by a heart of Manhattan before concentration above SoHo. If you’re meditative that sounds hideously impractical, you’re right. Construction would have broken 14 blocks, wiped out Little Italy and many of SoHo, and concerned a forced eviction of scarcely 2,000 families and over 800 businesses. Those that were left would have to put adult with a consistent bark of traffic, not to discuss a grave existence of vital underneath a petrify overpass.

Like a absurd Glasgow devise above, LOMEX strictly got a go-ahead. In 1968, a devise was certified by a Federal Bureau of Public Roads. Thankfully, by this point, open support for a devise had ebbed. In 1971, Governor Nelson Rockefeller suspended a devise indefinitely.

8Filling In Santa Monica Bay


One of California’s many renouned stretches of coast, Santa Monica Bay is essentially nature’s china backing to a pale fact that you’re vital in downtown Los Angeles. The beaches are cool, a roller good, and a sea ecosystem splendidly diverse. In a 1960s, it was motionless a many intelligent thing to do with this small cut of sky was to fill it with rubble.

At a time, a Pacific Coast Highway in a circuitously Santa Monica Mountains was constantly clogged with traffic. This was inspiring downtown LA’s streets and causing gridlock in Santa Monica itself. Fed adult with watchful in traffic, city officials motionless to build a new turnpike joining Santa Monica with apart Malibu. With no space to build it on a land, they incited to a ocean.

Stretching 10 kilometers (6 mi) and requiring a origination of dozens of synthetic islands, a Santa Monica Bay Causeway would cost half of what a whole city was worth. It would also have compulsory leveling a good understanding of a circuitously plateau and pouring a rubble into a bay, stuffing it up. The outcome would have been a drop of ecosystems, beaches, and one of California’s many dear views. Thankfully, it also would have been really costly and maybe even unfit to maintain. Faced with a crowd of technical challenges, a city eventually deserted a project.

7Thomas Willson’s Pyramid Of Death


It sounds like something from a creepy sci-fi film. A vast, ominous pyramid appearing 94 floors over a storm-lashed metropolis. Inside, circuitous catacombs lead by unconstrained chambers of a dead. Bodies on bodies, built high into a heavens. Five million dead, all congested into this one frightful space. In 19th-century London, this dark prophesy scarcely became a reality.

Proposed by Thomas Willson, a Pyramid of Death would have been 7 block kilometers (2.7 mi2), sitting on tip of Primrose Hill as a repository for all of London’s dead. If you’ve ever been to London, you’ll know what a essentially violent thought this was. Primrose Hill is one of a many dear observation points in a British capital, a widen of overwhelming parkland enjoyed by locals and visitors alike. Placing such a megastructure on it would not usually have broken all that, it’s expected a weight would have literally flattened a hill. Even creepier were Willson’s intentions for a monument. Rather than conceptualizing it as a eminent work for open good, he hoped to make £10 million in distinction from offered spaces for storing London’s deceased.

Eventually, a devise was nixed since of a repairs it would means to Primrose Hill. Remarkably, ambience didn’t come into it, notwithstanding a due structure after being likened to a “giant automobile park of a dead.”

6Demolishing Manhattan’s Entire West Side


New York’s a genuine love-it-or-hate-it city. For each chairman vehemence about a colourful humanities stage or dirty travel life, there’s another personally wishing a whole place could usually be chucked in a Hudson River. If you’re a latter type, a Hudson River Terminal competence sound like a dream come true. In 1946, it was due that a whole West Side of Manhattan be demolished and transposed with an impossibly immeasurable airport.

The devise was a brainchild of William Zeckendorf, a genuine estate noble obliged for a poignant cube of complicated NYC’s civic landscape. In other words, he wasn’t usually a bulb with an unfit dream. He was a bulb with an unfit dream and a means to presumably grasp it. When Life lonesome his skeleton in a 1946 issue, it positive readers that augmenting atmosphere trade meant a pattern would eventually turn a necessity. If it had been given a go-ahead, a airfield would have lonesome 144 blocks, been roughly a distance of Central Park, and rubbed as many planes an hour in a 1950s as JFK Airport manages today.

For reasons of cost and apparent insanity, a Hudson River Terminal was suspended before it ever got off a ground. That wasn’t a finish of Zeckendorf’s dreams, though. Around a same time, he attempted to build his possess private city-within-a-city on a land now assigned by a UN Headquarters.

5Turning London Into One Giant Motorway


For millions of people, a thought of vital subsequent to a bustling motorway is like a dream come true. If your greeting to reading that judgment was to immediately think, “no, it isn’t,” afterwards congratulations: You’re smarter than London’s city council. In a 1960s, a devise was sensitively certified that would have seen a network of wide, petrify roads move waves of cars zipping into each dilemma of a British capital.

Known as a London Ringways project, it was roughly frightful in a arrogant opinion to preservation. Consisting of 4 concentric loops streamer low into a city’s heart, it would have put London into a kind of petrify chokehold. Gone would be a outdoor parks and immature spaces, transposed with something from J.G. Ballard’s nightmares. Worst of all was Ringway One. The executive loop in this turn of madness, it would have crushed by some of London’s biggest districts, suffocating them underneath petrify and motorway noise. Camden Town, Hackney, Hampstead, and Islington would all have been plowed under, along with Brixton and Clapham Junction. In 1973, a Conservative supervision strictly gave a devise a immature light.

Thankfully, Britain in a latter half of a 20th century apparently had no income to do anything, since a devise was once again halted for being too expensive. Turns out being definitely pennyless isn’t always a bad thing.

4John Stuart McCaig’s Scottish Colosseum


In 1896, Scottish businessman John Stuart McCaig motionless to give something to his hometown of Oban. A small brook village on Scotland’s west coast, Oban was a city in need of many things. The one thing it didn’t need, however, was a gigantic, life-size reproduction of a Colosseum in Rome. Yet that’s accurately what McCaig motionless to build.

Known as McCaig’s Tower, all about a devise was both unreal and crazy. McCaig designed a building himself and picked a site on a hill, appearing over a small bay. But while it would have been manifest to everybody in town, a purpose wasn’t accurately to foster a open good. A grievous egotist, McCaig dictated to fill a finished Colosseum with countless statues of himself and members of his family, afterwards keep a whole thing off-limits to members of a public. It was one of a biggest self-centredness projects a universe had ever seen—like a Victorian Trump Tower, if Donald Trump was even some-more of a narcissist than he already is.

When McCaig died in 1902, he left behind a homogeneous of £6 million in today’s income to finish a tower. His sister begged a decider to chuck his will out, and a decider complied. Today, a unprepared bombard is deliberate a internal landmark.

3Demolishing Grand Central Station


We recently told we about a architectural crime that was a dispersion of NYC’s Penn Station. Little did we comprehend that that was roughly a footnote in an even some-more barbarous act. Between 1954 and a mid-1970s, New York Central Railroad did all in a energy to have a Grand Central Terminal pulled to a ground.

If you’ve ever even set feet in there, you’ll know what a terrible thought this was. Grand Central is like something from a enchanting past, when throwing trains was something we put a fit on to do. Yet a border to that a station’s owners pounded it over a decades bordered on a pathological. In 1963, New York Central attempted to destroy a terminal’s top levels by building a bowling alley over them. Just weeks after it was announced a ancestral landmark in 1967, a new owners Stuart Saunders—the same man who tore down a pleasing Penn Station—opened bids to bomb a depot and build a big, boxy building in a place. When a Landmarks Commission protested, Saunders sued it.

By a early 1970s, a decider had even ruled that Grand Central should be demolished, potentially invalidating a whole judgment of safeguarding ancestral landmarks. It was usually since Jackie Onassis wrote a really public, really expressive minute to a mayor pleading a city to recur that a statute was voted down in an appellate justice by a 3-2 vote. The same lunatics who wanted to rip a place down afterwards went on to scarcely broke NYC when their association unexpected went bust, requiring what was during that indicate a biggest bailout in history.

2Tearing Down Central London


If there’s one thing we can interpretation from this article, it’s that London’s legislature hates all about a city. Before a supervision was formulation to expostulate motorways by a core of a city, it was severely deliberation mixed proposals to hit down usually about each ancestral building in a center.

One of a categorical targets was Piccadilly Circus. One of a many famous destinations in a British capital, Piccadilly Circus is a stately garb of grand 19th-century architecture. Yet in a 1960s, London County Council’s Sir William Holford set out a devise job for a dispersion of 3 buliding of a buildings. The aim was to solve a problem of trade congestion, that is kind of like chopping your leg off to solve a problem of an tingling foot. Tottenham Court Road was also earmarked for appalling redevelopment.

Craziest of all were a skeleton for London’s scandalous Soho district. A obstruction of circuitous streets, ancestral pubs, and decrepit red-light clubs, Soho is now a world-class attraction. Yet in 1954, a devise was put brazen to explode a whole district and petrify a remains. In a place would be built a array of ominous bureau towers and a network of fallen motorways.

1Driving A Railway Through The Middle Of Stonehenge


Stonehenge is one of a biggest monuments on Earth. A collection of ancient stones lifted thousands of years ago in a dilemma of England, it’s as puzzling and grand as a Pyramids or Machu Picchu. It’s also an area of good systematic value, with a whole Stonehenge site covering many kilometers and including a equally puzzling circuitously mill round of Avebury. In a 19th century, a Victorians went clearly out of their approach to destroy a whole lot.

The misfortune try came in 1886, when a London South West Railway association attempted to expostulate a railway right by a core of a site. Aside from entrance right nearby to Stonehenge itself, a line would have cut opposite a Stonehenge Cursus, a kind of ancient embankment that scientists trust predates a henge. The suit was defeated, yet 10 years later, another railway line was due that brushed right adult opposite a station stones.

Even this has zero on Avebury. A immeasurable henge that’s in some ways even grander than a some-more renouned sibling, Avebury was sole off for housing in 1872 and scarcely demolished. It’s usually since a British MP named John Lubbock fast brought adult all a building sites in a unfortunate bid to save it that Avebury still exists today. Had a Victorians gotten their way, this famed dilemma of England would now be a many culturally poorer place.


Morris M. Morris is a freelance author and newly-qualified teacher, still naively anticipating to make a disproportion in his students’ lives. You can send your useful and less-than-helpful comments to his email, or revisit some of a other websites that inexplicably sinecure him.

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *